Psst… Pass It On: Stop Usage Based Billing
Posted by Laurel L. Russwurm on September 1, 2009
Just a mom, with a blog.
Like you, I’m a member of the Canadian public that the CRTC believes does not matter. In granting the Bell Canada request for Usage Based Billing the CRTC casually dismissed the Canadian public– the very people they exist to serve– in one sentence:
Telecom Order CRTC 2009-484 – Ottawa, 12 August 2009 – Introduction
“2…. The Commission also received a large number of comments, mostly from individuals;
these submissions generally opposed the Bell companies’ applications.”
Like most Canadians I didn’t know about Usage Based Billing, so I wasn’t one of the “nobodies” who posted the comments so cavalierly dismissed by the CRTC.
Some people in the Canadian computer community were in fact aware of the Usage Based Billing issue because American ISPs had been trying to get Usage Based Billing approved in the States. So pros and cons of Usage Based Billing had been discussed in technical forums, often alongside net neutrality. (Something else I’d never heard of.) But the FCC turned them down. So the Americans have provided a bona fide example of a telecommunications regulator actually operating for the public good. Huzzah!
None of those technical folks with their thumbs on the pulse of the internet were prepared for the sudden onset of Usage Based Billing. The first even THEY seemed to have heard of it was on the last day (the only day?) submissions were to be accepted by the CRTC.
Why don’t Canadians know that their internet costs will double in less than three months?
Because Usage Based Billing has not been in the news. That’s the way the CRTC and Bell Canada want it. The last thing they want is for ordinary people to find about about this.
They need to keep Canadians in the dark.
After all, CTV is ignoring it. The Globe and Mail is ignoring it. Of course Bell Canada is a very large shareholder in both of these news outlets. And of course the news media controlled by Rogers isn’t covering Usage Based Billing either. Coincidence? I think not.
The only coverage I’ve been able to find is some stories on CBC online, but the story apparently hasn’t been big enough to keep alive. But still, thank goodness for CBC, because their coverage has been better than nothing.
The big problem is that although most people who know about this are understandably annoyed:
Most Canadians still have not even heard of Usage Based Billing
The first time most Canadians will even find out about Usage Based Billing will be when they are suddenly hit with a huge bill.
The problem is, Usage Based Billing will have a huge impact on Canada.
Short term, it will cost us twice as much as we’ve been paying to go online. Which will make Canada far and away the most expensive place on earth to access the internet.
And we’re not talking about improved service. Canadian’s won’t get anything new or better for the privilege of paying twice as much.
The reason Bell Canada wants to introduce Usage Based Billing is to be able to inflate the take.
And incidentally kill off Bell Sympatico’s surprisingly robust competition.
The CRTC’s own website says:
“But the CRTC’s role in telecommunications is evolving. In many telecom markets, several consumer choices are available. This natural competition results in better prices and packages for consumers. In these cases, CRTC allows competition, not regulations, to drive the market. The CRTC regulates only where the market doesn’t meet the objectives of the Telecommunications Act. CRTC’s website http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/backgrnd/brochures/b29903.htm
Yet the CRTC’s approval of Bell Canada’s Usage Based Billing does precisely the opposite of what they claim they do.
Usage Based Billing will directly harm the independant ISPs who purchase bandwidth wholesale through Bell Canada’s Gateway Access System. These ISPs have done a good job. They’ve brought competition into the Canadian marketplace in exactly the way they were supposed to. Because they offer great service and great deals, they have been getting customers. Maybe even customers who are dissatisfied with Bell Canada.
The introduction of Usage Based Billing means that all the people who have contracted for internet service through the independent ISPs will find our service providers can no longer meet the terms of the contract. The fledgling Independant ISPs will be hit badly. This will stun, stall or eliminate Bell Canada’s internet competition. Usage Based Billing is here because the CRTC used regulations to drive the market into the ground. Not for the benefit of Canada. But for the benefit of Bell Canada.
Bell Canada is a soulless corporation, and as such they are entitled to be greedy and desirous of making make twice as much money for the same service.
Usage Based Billing is NOT what the CRTC is mandated to do.
The CRTC exists expressly to regulate soulless telecommunication giants so they can’t double costs to Canadians for no reason beyond corporate greed.
Usage Based Billing will compromise or eliminate both access and affordability. The CRTC has no excuse for giving Bell Canada carte blanche to gouge the taxpayers they are supposed to represent. This CRTC regulation is in direct contravention of their own stated objectives of the Telecommunications Act.
This is what the CRTC is supposed to do on behalf of all us nobodies:
According to the CRTC’s own website, the CRTC is supposed to:
- CRTC Mandate: ….ensure that both the broadcasting and telecommunications systems serve the Canadian public.
- Broadcasting: ….ensures that all Canadians have access to a wide variety of high-quality Canadian programming….
- Telecommunications ….ensures that Canadians receive reliable telephone and other telecommunications services, at affordable prices.
The CRTC is incompetent, or the CRTC is corrupt. It doesn’t really matter which because the result is the same.
The point is that they are not only NOT supposed to do harm to Canada the CRTC is supposed to protect Canadian interests.
And this ruling will unquestionably harm Canada. At minimum CRTC is not doing their job.
And this will harm Canada how?
The increased cost means that Canadians will be paying much more than citizens of other countries to access the internet.
The costs to Canada will include (but not be limited to) Canadians paying to:
- receive spam in their email,
- see advertisements on websites,
- or to upgrade Windows.
- Job seekers may not be able to access jobs requiring online response.
- School web access will be underused as families may not be able to afford the bandwidth.
- Grandmothers downloading photos may be forced to choose between internet access and dinner.
- The people who can barely afford to get online now will find it much more difficult when the cost is so much higher.
Economic damage done to Canada, although more difficult to quantify, will happen nonetheless. For instance:
- Research and development will not be undertaken by scientists, inventors and web developers because of exorbitant cost constraints not faced by scientists, inventors and web developers in other countries.
- Many Canadian Arts start-ups will not happen because suddenly Canadian graphic designers, artists, musicians and writers will no longer be able to avail themselves of the low or no-cost internet that will still be available to the other artists, writers and musicians in the rest of the world. Without this means of promoting their work in the face of exorbitant internet charges, many budding talents will be lost to Canadian culture.
- Canadian IT Businesses who have already invested in websites dependent on high traffic counts neccesary to generate advertising revenue may find themselves floundering and failing in the face of a drastically reduced Canadian customer base. The artists, writers and musicians who do manage to commission websites or contract with hosting sites, will still have a much harder time connecting with their potential audience because the audience will need to be more careful in how they use the internet due to exorbitant usage costs not faced by consumers in other countries.
This economic damage won’t just impact on internet users, it will impact on all of Canada. Economically. In the midst of a recession.
Since the news media isn’t reporting this, we need to spread the word because the word MUST spread.
The petition to http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ has slowed to a trickle. I think most of the people who know about Usage Based Billing have already signed it. But it is still very important to get more signatures. Hitting the 10,000 mark would be a big enough story that the major news outlets would not be able to ignore it without losing credibility.
But in the mean time, since the major news outlets aren’t telling anyone, WE must be the ones to pass it on. It’s time for us nobodies to reach out and touch someone. Individually none of us have the reach to spread the news to very many people at all. But if we all took the time to tell just a few people, the story would get around.
Write a letter to your Member of Parliament. If you don’t know who that is, you can find out at :Members of Parliament. Snail mail to elected officials is still free.
If anyone needs to borrow bits from the Stop Usage Based Billing blog to use in any letters, everything in this blog is in the public domain. So feel free to help yourself if any of what I’ve written will help. Also, the UBB Glossary is pretty good reference material.
Another way ordinary Canadians can tell total strangers about Usage Based Billing is through writing a letter to the editor of your local newspaper. Smaller newspapers, even free ones have an audience. Even if it doesn’t get published, at least somebody will read it. And if they don’t publish, you can always send it along here and I will publish it.)
I’ve signed up with Identi.ca where I’m starting a StopUBB group at http://identi.ca/group/subb
Canadians need to find out about this before the damage is done. Do what you can.
So please, pass it on!
This entry was posted on September 1, 2009 at 4:16 am and is filed under Changing the World. Tagged: ad revenue, Canadian, Canadian culture, community, corrupt, damage, exorbitant usage costs, expert, FCC, glossary, grandmothers, graphic designers, harm, high traffic, hosting. ISP, incompetent, individual, inventors, job seekers, musicians, Net Neutrality, nobody, public domain, recession, research and development, submission, telecommunications, web developers, websites, Windows, writers. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.