There has yet to be actual proof that throttling was ever necessary – except as a means of gouging customers
Posted by Laurel L. Russwurm on December 21, 2011
Bell Canada has announced that it will cease throttling users.
Please note: Bell’s argument for throttling was that it was necessary to keep the Internet safe from brown-outs. Clearly, that is not/was not the case.
Rogers continues to throttle customers Internet usage, and is currently in trouble with the CRTC for violating Internet rules which “rules allow throttling of peer-to-peer file sharing programs like BitTorrent, but not of time-sensitive Internet traffic like video chatting or gaming.” Because they claimed the Internet was getting too busy, the carriers said throttling was necessary. Instead of slowing down all Internet traffic, the carrier/ISPs targeted peer-to-peer Internet traffic, an efficient way of transferring large files online. Yet the CRTC granted the carrier/ISPs permission to discriminate against users who use peer to peer.
This isn’t rocket science. When customers pay for Internet service, they should get what they pay for. It is ridiculous that CRTC allowed Bell and Rogers to deliberately degrade their customers service in the first place.